Mr. Wrestlemania?

Okay I love HBK and have always been a big fan. However I am tired of hearing him being refered to as Mr. Wrestlemania. As much as love him I don't think he deserves that title. I think it belongs to some one else: The Undertaker. He is 16-0 if anyone dersves the title its him not HBK.



Does anyone else agree?Mr. Wrestlemania?
Undertaker is and aways will be Wrestlemania. He is 16-0 at Wrestlemania and is always a fan favorite. He went undefeated in his 1st year of WWF
You have a point, Taker is the most dominating wrestler at wrestlemania, he's legend because of his strike at WM and not only, but the show stopper had great matches at wrestlemainia too, didn't win as many as the phenom but I can't say he doesn't deserve the "Mr Wrestlemania" title. Taker deserves it more, but I guess it just suits better for hbk. Undertaker has a whole different character; plus his strike specks for itself, no need 4 a special title.Mr. Wrestlemania?
I dont think when he's called Mr. Wrestlemania it's talking about his wins. Undertaker's match are so predictable. Shawn matches are innovative and a guarenteed to be good, no matter if he's in the main event or not.



Undertaker deserves that title more, but that doesnt mean Shawn doesn't derserve it at all.
ok listen.

what if Taker lost that streak????????

HBK always steel the show at WM.

people, Vince McMahon, had a match of the year with HBK at WM.

if HBK can carrie Vince to a match of the year, then he can carrie anyone to a match of the year.



But good t anyway.



STARREDMr. Wrestlemania?
I do agree, I do love him, tho but like you say, undertaker is doing really, well extremely well, HBK should be Master Wrestlemainia, while Undertaker, the new Mr Wrestlemainia
hbk has entertained many more people during his matches than the taker who only draws people in because they know he will win no matter what
well said!!! he has lost more than won as wm.If there is one wrestler who deserves that title it is the phenom.......starred.

sprinter